<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 774 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99783</link>
    <description>Lubricating oils and greases used to keep manufacturing machinery operating smoothly were treated as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, so Modvat credit was admissible. Credit on the strength of the original invoice was not allowed unless the assessee first satisfied the jurisdictional authority that the duplicate copy had been lost in transit; that statutory condition was not met, so credit was disallowed on that ground. Cables, cable wires, CI slag box and roll tyre secondary crusher were accepted as capital goods or accessories integrally connected with production, and credit on those items was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 774 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99783</link>
      <description>Lubricating oils and greases used to keep manufacturing machinery operating smoothly were treated as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, so Modvat credit was admissible. Credit on the strength of the original invoice was not allowed unless the assessee first satisfied the jurisdictional authority that the duplicate copy had been lost in transit; that statutory condition was not met, so credit was disallowed on that ground. Cables, cable wires, CI slag box and roll tyre secondary crusher were accepted as capital goods or accessories integrally connected with production, and credit on those items was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>