<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 181 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99770</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application, upholding the validity of the proceeding under the Companies Act, 1956. It affirmed the Registrar&#039;s jurisdiction to conduct a de novo hearing to rectify the initial invalid proceeding, emphasizing compliance with principles of natural justice. The court clarified that the Registrar&#039;s action was not a review but a corrective measure. Other issues raised were left for determination by the Registrar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:59:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 181 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99770</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application, upholding the validity of the proceeding under the Companies Act, 1956. It affirmed the Registrar&#039;s jurisdiction to conduct a de novo hearing to rectify the initial invalid proceeding, emphasizing compliance with principles of natural justice. The court clarified that the Registrar&#039;s action was not a review but a corrective measure. Other issues raised were left for determination by the Registrar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>