<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 200 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99763</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application against five former directors of a company in liquidation, ruling in their favor due to insufficient evidence supporting the misfeasance allegations. The court found no substantial case against most directors, emphasizing the need for detailed allegations and quantification of losses. While one director settled resulting in a reduced claim, the court highlighted the failure to promptly sell pledged assets by another director, leading to reduced losses. Ultimately, the court declined to hold the directors accountable for the company&#039;s losses and did not award costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:52:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 200 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99763</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application against five former directors of a company in liquidation, ruling in their favor due to insufficient evidence supporting the misfeasance allegations. The court found no substantial case against most directors, emphasizing the need for detailed allegations and quantification of losses. While one director settled resulting in a reduced claim, the court highlighted the failure to promptly sell pledged assets by another director, leading to reduced losses. Ultimately, the court declined to hold the directors accountable for the company&#039;s losses and did not award costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>