<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 199 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99762</link>
    <description>The court held that the issues raised regarding the validity of the delegates&#039; election process, nomination of a branch secretary to the director board, legality of delegates from the SNDP Sabha, proper publication of candidates for the office of director, and preparation and publication of the voters&#039; list were internal management matters not justiciable unless there is a clear breach of statutory provisions or the company&#039;s articles. It was concluded that the company court lacked jurisdiction in these matters, directing the petitioner to seek remedy through a civil suit in the appropriate court. The company petition was dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 199 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99762</link>
      <description>The court held that the issues raised regarding the validity of the delegates&#039; election process, nomination of a branch secretary to the director board, legality of delegates from the SNDP Sabha, proper publication of candidates for the office of director, and preparation and publication of the voters&#039; list were internal management matters not justiciable unless there is a clear breach of statutory provisions or the company&#039;s articles. It was concluded that the company court lacked jurisdiction in these matters, directing the petitioner to seek remedy through a civil suit in the appropriate court. The company petition was dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>