<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 651 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99760</link>
    <description>Rectification under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the Tribunal&#039;s own order; it cannot be used to cure a party&#039;s defective appeal papers or substitute a corrected factual statement after dismissal. As no apparent error in the dismissal order was shown, the rectification request was held not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:48:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 651 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99760</link>
      <description>Rectification under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the Tribunal&#039;s own order; it cannot be used to cure a party&#039;s defective appeal papers or substitute a corrected factual statement after dismissal. As no apparent error in the dismissal order was shown, the rectification request was held not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>