https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99751 The court held that the claimants' objection petitions were not maintainable as they failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time limit under rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The judge emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and dismissed the claim petitions, endorsing the list of creditors settled by the official liquidator. The ruling underscored the necessity of following prescribed procedures and timelines in liquidation proceedings for seeking redressal regarding claims. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:38:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99751 The court held that the claimants' objection petitions were not maintainable as they failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time limit under rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The judge emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and dismissed the claim petitions, endorsing the list of creditors settled by the official liquidator. The ruling underscored the necessity of following prescribed procedures and timelines in liquidation proceedings for seeking redressal regarding claims. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 30 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99751