https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99741 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to it being a non-speaking order that exceeded the show cause notice. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for fresh consideration, directing a detailed analysis of each item's manufacturing process to determine dutiability. The adjudicating authority was instructed to address the remaining 10 items attracting duty and clarify the duty demand for miscellaneous goods. The Tribunal emphasized completing the adjudication promptly and allowed the appeal by remand. en-us Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99741 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to it being a non-speaking order that exceeded the show cause notice. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for fresh consideration, directing a detailed analysis of each item's manufacturing process to determine dutiability. The adjudicating authority was instructed to address the remaining 10 items attracting duty and clarify the duty demand for miscellaneous goods. The Tribunal emphasized completing the adjudication promptly and allowed the appeal by remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99741