<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 894 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99736</link>
    <description>Failure to comply with the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 led to dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal noted that the stay order fixed a deadline for deposit of specified amounts, the deposits were not made within time, and no extension order from the High Court or Supreme Court was produced. On that basis, it found no ground to restore the dismissed appeals and rejected the restoration applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 894 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99736</link>
      <description>Failure to comply with the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 led to dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal noted that the stay order fixed a deadline for deposit of specified amounts, the deposits were not made within time, and no extension order from the High Court or Supreme Court was produced. On that basis, it found no ground to restore the dismissed appeals and rejected the restoration applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>