<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 893 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99735</link>
    <description>Goods were treated as technically liable to confiscation, but the absence of wilful misdeclaration and mens rea weighed against sustaining a high redemption fine. The accepted valuation and payment of duty were also relevant, and the personal penalty was viewed as only nominal. On that basis, the redemption fine was reduced, while the personal penalty was not interfered with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 893 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99735</link>
      <description>Goods were treated as technically liable to confiscation, but the absence of wilful misdeclaration and mens rea weighed against sustaining a high redemption fine. The accepted valuation and payment of duty were also relevant, and the personal penalty was viewed as only nominal. On that basis, the redemption fine was reduced, while the personal penalty was not interfered with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>