<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 150 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99717</link>
    <description>An interpleader suit against a company in liquidation falls within the wide expression &quot;suit or proceeding&quot; in section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. Because such a suit brings rival claimants before the court in relation to the company&#039;s interest in the subject-matter, it is treated as a proceeding affecting the company in liquidation and is subject to the winding-up court&#039;s control. The absence of any express exclusion for interpleader proceedings, together with the scheme of section 446 and Order 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, supports this construction. Such a suit cannot be instituted or continued without leave of the company court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:43:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 150 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99717</link>
      <description>An interpleader suit against a company in liquidation falls within the wide expression &quot;suit or proceeding&quot; in section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. Because such a suit brings rival claimants before the court in relation to the company&#039;s interest in the subject-matter, it is treated as a proceeding affecting the company in liquidation and is subject to the winding-up court&#039;s control. The absence of any express exclusion for interpleader proceedings, together with the scheme of section 446 and Order 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, supports this construction. Such a suit cannot be instituted or continued without leave of the company court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>