<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 682 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order imposing penalties and confiscating goods and vehicles in four appeals. The appellants successfully refuted allegations of smuggling and document manipulation by presenting documentary evidence supporting the legitimate purchase and transportation of the goods. The judgment highlighted the significance of documentary evidence over circumstantial evidence, ruling in favor of the appellants and providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 682 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order imposing penalties and confiscating goods and vehicles in four appeals. The appellants successfully refuted allegations of smuggling and document manipulation by presenting documentary evidence supporting the legitimate purchase and transportation of the goods. The judgment highlighted the significance of documentary evidence over circumstantial evidence, ruling in favor of the appellants and providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>