https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99646 Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act kept the appeal grounds originally incorporated from section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, so a later substitution of section 100 did not alter the special statutory appeal right. The Commission's corrective power under section 13(2) was described as a broad power to revoke or amend an earlier order where it was plainly erroneous, unsupported by material, affected by vital omission, or otherwise unsustainable; it was not confined to Order XLVII, Rule 1 CPC and was not barred by acquiescence or estoppel on the facts stated. A cease and desist order affecting restrictive trade practices must rest on relevant material and recorded reasons, and an order lacking both is legally unsustainable and liable to be revoked. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2020 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99646 Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act kept the appeal grounds originally incorporated from section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, so a later substitution of section 100 did not alter the special statutory appeal right. The Commission's corrective power under section 13(2) was described as a broad power to revoke or amend an earlier order where it was plainly erroneous, unsupported by material, affected by vital omission, or otherwise unsustainable; it was not confined to Order XLVII, Rule 1 CPC and was not barred by acquiescence or estoppel on the facts stated. A cease and desist order affecting restrictive trade practices must rest on relevant material and recorded reasons, and an order lacking both is legally unsustainable and liable to be revoked. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99646