<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 153 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99640</link>
    <description>Limitation for an official liquidator&#039;s application under section 446 is computed under article 137 read with section 458A of the Companies Act. Delay may be condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act where a bona fide belief, based on an unsettled legal position, constitutes sufficient cause. An incomplete or blank-signed hire-purchase agreement does not invalidate an admitted and acted-upon transaction. Allegations of fabricated accounts or vehicle repossession require reliable supporting evidence. Recovery is confined to hire-money advanced, incidental charges and interest proved by the evidence, rather than the full amount claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 153 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99640</link>
      <description>Limitation for an official liquidator&#039;s application under section 446 is computed under article 137 read with section 458A of the Companies Act. Delay may be condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act where a bona fide belief, based on an unsettled legal position, constitutes sufficient cause. An incomplete or blank-signed hire-purchase agreement does not invalidate an admitted and acted-upon transaction. Allegations of fabricated accounts or vehicle repossession require reliable supporting evidence. Recovery is confined to hire-money advanced, incidental charges and interest proved by the evidence, rather than the full amount claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>