https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99631 Eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was disputed on the ground that another person's brand name was used, and the matter required fresh examination by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for de novo consideration after giving the party an opportunity of hearing. en-us Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:35:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99631 Eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was disputed on the ground that another person's brand name was used, and the matter required fresh examination by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for de novo consideration after giving the party an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99631