<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 605 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99625</link>
    <description>Untrimmed copper sheets and circles under Heading 7409 were treated as specifically covered by Notification No. 135/94-C.E., not the wider exemption under Notification No. 42/94-C.E. The concessional rate applied only where no credit under Rule 57A or Rule 57Q had been taken and the goods were intended for use in the manufacture of handicrafts or utensils. The classification list recorded that intended use, but that did not alter the notification scheme. The argument that trimming did not amount to manufacture did not displace the duty liability fixed under the applicable notification, and the demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 605 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99625</link>
      <description>Untrimmed copper sheets and circles under Heading 7409 were treated as specifically covered by Notification No. 135/94-C.E., not the wider exemption under Notification No. 42/94-C.E. The concessional rate applied only where no credit under Rule 57A or Rule 57Q had been taken and the goods were intended for use in the manufacture of handicrafts or utensils. The classification list recorded that intended use, but that did not alter the notification scheme. The argument that trimming did not amount to manufacture did not displace the duty liability fixed under the applicable notification, and the demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>