<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 712 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99615</link>
    <description>Customs valuation of imported used clothing could not be enhanced from the declared transaction value on the basis of a solitary comparable import, because rejection of transaction value requires reliable contemporaneous evidence and genuine comparability in origin, quantity and consignment characteristics. The relied-upon entry was insufficient to justify valuation at US $ 1.05 per kg, so that enhancement was not sustained. However, the declared value of US $ 0.32 per kg was also not accepted as final, as the record supported the prevailing customs practice of valuing such goods at US $ 0.45 per kg. The assessable value was therefore fixed at US $ 0.45 per kg.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 712 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99615</link>
      <description>Customs valuation of imported used clothing could not be enhanced from the declared transaction value on the basis of a solitary comparable import, because rejection of transaction value requires reliable contemporaneous evidence and genuine comparability in origin, quantity and consignment characteristics. The relied-upon entry was insufficient to justify valuation at US $ 1.05 per kg, so that enhancement was not sustained. However, the declared value of US $ 0.32 per kg was also not accepted as final, as the record supported the prevailing customs practice of valuing such goods at US $ 0.45 per kg. The assessable value was therefore fixed at US $ 0.45 per kg.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>