<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 236 - ITAT of Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99594</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT of Mumbai allowed depreciation on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) card, considering it an intangible asset under section 32 of the IT Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to permit depreciation in accordance with the law. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of carrying forward a speculation loss of Rs. 42,416, as the appellant did not contest it before the authorities, emphasizing the significance of timely addressing such issues for favorable outcomes in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:17:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 236 - ITAT of Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99594</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT of Mumbai allowed depreciation on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) card, considering it an intangible asset under section 32 of the IT Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to permit depreciation in accordance with the law. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of carrying forward a speculation loss of Rs. 42,416, as the appellant did not contest it before the authorities, emphasizing the significance of timely addressing such issues for favorable outcomes in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>