<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 555 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99568</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bangalore partially allowed the appeal by reducing the penalty imposed on the proprietor under the Customs Act, 1962. The confiscation of goods and redemption fine on the firm&#039;s goods were confirmed. However, the employee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, maintaining the penalty imposed. The Tribunal considered lack of direct involvement of the proprietor in the misdeclaration, leading to the adjustment of penalties. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the case, evidence, and arguments presented, ensuring a fair outcome regarding penalties for attempting to export mis-declared goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:04:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 555 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99568</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bangalore partially allowed the appeal by reducing the penalty imposed on the proprietor under the Customs Act, 1962. The confiscation of goods and redemption fine on the firm&#039;s goods were confirmed. However, the employee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, maintaining the penalty imposed. The Tribunal considered lack of direct involvement of the proprietor in the misdeclaration, leading to the adjustment of penalties. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the case, evidence, and arguments presented, ensuring a fair outcome regarding penalties for attempting to export mis-declared goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>