<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 544 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99554</link>
    <description>Under excise valuation principles, a consistently granted 22% trade discount could not be disallowed merely because the goods were cleared to depots and later sold from there. The Tribunal treated the factory-gate price, after deducting the uniform trade discount allowed to all customers, as the correct assessable value, and held that routing through depots did not change that position. The attempt to deny the deduction solely on the basis of depot clearances was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the discount for valuation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 544 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99554</link>
      <description>Under excise valuation principles, a consistently granted 22% trade discount could not be disallowed merely because the goods were cleared to depots and later sold from there. The Tribunal treated the factory-gate price, after deducting the uniform trade discount allowed to all customers, as the correct assessable value, and held that routing through depots did not change that position. The attempt to deny the deduction solely on the basis of depot clearances was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the discount for valuation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>