<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 569 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99519</link>
    <description>The court set aside the penalties and confiscation orders imposed under Sections 111(d), (f), (1) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962, for the confiscation of Chinese silk yarn. The judge found that the discrepancies in description, weight, and port were satisfactorily explained, and the goods were not clandestinely imported. The appellants were directed to clear the goods upon payment of duty in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 569 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99519</link>
      <description>The court set aside the penalties and confiscation orders imposed under Sections 111(d), (f), (1) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962, for the confiscation of Chinese silk yarn. The judge found that the discrepancies in description, weight, and port were satisfactorily explained, and the goods were not clandestinely imported. The appellants were directed to clear the goods upon payment of duty in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>