https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99508 The Tribunal dismissed the rectification applications, upheld the Customs' attachment of properties, confirmed penalties by the Additional Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, and deemed the confiscation of goods lawful under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The effects of the repealed order were upheld due to the saving clause in the repealing legislation, clarifying that "law" includes orders issued under the relevant Act. Stay petitions were also dismissed following the rejection of the rectification applications. en-us Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:58:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99508 The Tribunal dismissed the rectification applications, upheld the Customs' attachment of properties, confirmed penalties by the Additional Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, and deemed the confiscation of goods lawful under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The effects of the repealed order were upheld due to the saving clause in the repealing legislation, clarifying that "law" includes orders issued under the relevant Act. Stay petitions were also dismissed following the rejection of the rectification applications. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99508