<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (5) TMI 71 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99506</link>
    <description>The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioners as the complaint failed to establish that the balance-sheet and profit and loss account were prepared and presented at an annual general meeting, as required by section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The judgment emphasized the necessity of meeting statutory requirements before penalizing non-compliance with the Act&#039;s provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (5) TMI 71 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99506</link>
      <description>The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioners as the complaint failed to establish that the balance-sheet and profit and loss account were prepared and presented at an annual general meeting, as required by section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The judgment emphasized the necessity of meeting statutory requirements before penalizing non-compliance with the Act&#039;s provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>