<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 123 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99485</link>
    <description>Proceedings under sections 542 and 543 of the Companies Act may begin during winding up once relevant disclosures make fraud, misfeasance, misapplication or breach of trust appear, without waiting for final liquidation accounts or an established shortfall. The application was also held to be within limitation, because the section 543 filing was within five years of the winding-up order and the section 542 claim was brought within three years of the statement of affairs disclosing the relevant conduct. General allegations were insufficient, however, and the application could proceed only against respondents against whom specific material was pleaded, not against respondents 3 to 6.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 123 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99485</link>
      <description>Proceedings under sections 542 and 543 of the Companies Act may begin during winding up once relevant disclosures make fraud, misfeasance, misapplication or breach of trust appear, without waiting for final liquidation accounts or an established shortfall. The application was also held to be within limitation, because the section 543 filing was within five years of the winding-up order and the section 542 claim was brought within three years of the statement of affairs disclosing the relevant conduct. General allegations were insufficient, however, and the application could proceed only against respondents against whom specific material was pleaded, not against respondents 3 to 6.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>