<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99483</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the company as it found that the company did not meet the condition of being unable to pay its debts under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The liabilities were considered contingent, not present debts, and there was no evidence of financial mismanagement or profit manipulation by the company. Therefore, the court concluded that the company was not in a state of insolvency warranting a winding-up order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99483</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the company as it found that the company did not meet the condition of being unable to pay its debts under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The liabilities were considered contingent, not present debts, and there was no evidence of financial mismanagement or profit manipulation by the company. Therefore, the court concluded that the company was not in a state of insolvency warranting a winding-up order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>