https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99465 Proceedings continued after a winding-up order without leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 are not automatically a nullity; they are voidable and may be avoided by the official liquidator if he chooses to challenge them. The note also states that a hire-purchase liability may be proved from surrounding materials even where the written agreement is unavailable, but ancillary claims such as incidentals and interest require reliable supporting proof. Where the evidence supports the transaction, the company may also seek release of the vehicle from custody. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:40:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99465 Proceedings continued after a winding-up order without leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 are not automatically a nullity; they are voidable and may be avoided by the official liquidator if he chooses to challenge them. The note also states that a hire-purchase liability may be proved from surrounding materials even where the written agreement is unavailable, but ancillary claims such as incidentals and interest require reliable supporting proof. Where the evidence supports the transaction, the company may also seek release of the vehicle from custody. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 07 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99465