<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 760 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99448</link>
    <description>Credit on hot tops used in the manufacturing process was treated as allowable because the item was regarded as a chemical item falling within modvatable goods on the basis of the controlling High Court ruling. That authoritative decision was treated as covering the issue, so no separate referable question of law was found to exist. The reference application was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 760 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99448</link>
      <description>Credit on hot tops used in the manufacturing process was treated as allowable because the item was regarded as a chemical item falling within modvatable goods on the basis of the controlling High Court ruling. That authoritative decision was treated as covering the issue, so no separate referable question of law was found to exist. The reference application was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>