<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 135 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99444</link>
    <description>The winding-up petition was admitted, requiring the company to pay the decretal amount, interest, and costs by February 16, 1976. Failure to comply would result in the petition being advertised and listed on March 29, 1976. The court deemed the petition legitimate, emphasizing commercial morality and probity, and dismissed the company&#039;s arguments as lacking merit and aimed at thwarting the petitioning-creditor&#039;s debt recovery efforts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:19:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 135 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99444</link>
      <description>The winding-up petition was admitted, requiring the company to pay the decretal amount, interest, and costs by February 16, 1976. Failure to comply would result in the petition being advertised and listed on March 29, 1976. The court deemed the petition legitimate, emphasizing commercial morality and probity, and dismissed the company&#039;s arguments as lacking merit and aimed at thwarting the petitioning-creditor&#039;s debt recovery efforts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>