<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (11) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99442</link>
    <description>Entries in a balance-sheet and directors&#039; report were examined to see whether they constituted an acknowledgment of liability sufficient to defeat a limitation defence in a winding-up petition. The Court held that the balance-sheet entry showing the amount under secured loans, together with Schedule &#039;A&#039; describing the liability as partly secured and unconfirmed, did not by itself conclusively establish acknowledgment. The directors&#039; report also stated that the relevant liabilities, except specified debts, were barred by limitation and were not confirmed by the directors. On these materials, limitation remained a bona fide dispute, and the alleged acknowledgment was not enough to override it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (11) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99442</link>
      <description>Entries in a balance-sheet and directors&#039; report were examined to see whether they constituted an acknowledgment of liability sufficient to defeat a limitation defence in a winding-up petition. The Court held that the balance-sheet entry showing the amount under secured loans, together with Schedule &#039;A&#039; describing the liability as partly secured and unconfirmed, did not by itself conclusively establish acknowledgment. The directors&#039; report also stated that the relevant liabilities, except specified debts, were barred by limitation and were not confirmed by the directors. On these materials, limitation remained a bona fide dispute, and the alleged acknowledgment was not enough to override it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>