<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 686 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the Commissioner&#039;s imposition of a redemption fine and personal penalty under the Customs Act was not justified as re-export of the goods was allowed. The Tribunal set aside the fine and penalty, permitting the re-export of the consignment without any additional charges. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 686 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the Commissioner&#039;s imposition of a redemption fine and personal penalty under the Customs Act was not justified as re-export of the goods was allowed. The Tribunal set aside the fine and penalty, permitting the re-export of the consignment without any additional charges. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>