<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 683 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99420</link>
    <description>Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was applied on the basis of the value of clearances of the specified goods up to the prescribed aggregate exemption limit. The Tribunal&#039;s settled view was that the benefit attaches to the value of goods cleared, and excise duty becomes payable only on the portion exceeding the threshold. On that approach, the Commissioner (Appeals) found no infirmity in extending the exemption for the oil furnace boiler clearance, and the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 683 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99420</link>
      <description>Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was applied on the basis of the value of clearances of the specified goods up to the prescribed aggregate exemption limit. The Tribunal&#039;s settled view was that the benefit attaches to the value of goods cleared, and excise duty becomes payable only on the portion exceeding the threshold. On that approach, the Commissioner (Appeals) found no infirmity in extending the exemption for the oil furnace boiler clearance, and the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>