https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99406 An order passed in misfeasance proceedings under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956 may be enforced as a decree, so ordinary execution modes under section 50 CPC are available. The Kerala HC held that the limitation on passing compulsive orders directly against heirs or legal representatives in the misfeasance jurisdiction does not bar execution of an existing order against the deceased director's estate in the hands of legal representatives. The liability could be declared in the misfeasance proceedings, and lawful remedies against the estate remained open. The objection to execution was rejected and appointment of a receiver was upheld. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:00:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99406 An order passed in misfeasance proceedings under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956 may be enforced as a decree, so ordinary execution modes under section 50 CPC are available. The Kerala HC held that the limitation on passing compulsive orders directly against heirs or legal representatives in the misfeasance jurisdiction does not bar execution of an existing order against the deceased director's estate in the hands of legal representatives. The liability could be declared in the misfeasance proceedings, and lawful remedies against the estate remained open. The objection to execution was rejected and appointment of a receiver was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 16 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99406