<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99401</link>
    <description>Where validity of entries in the register of members is disputed, the preferred remedy is rectification and petitions under minority-protection provisions seeking relief dependent on membership alteration are not maintainable until rectification is determined; a change in management effected to protect or satisfy a creditor&#039;s interest falls within the creditor-exception and does not by itself constitute actionable conduct under minority-protection provisions; allegations of removal as director or general mismanagement do not constitute oppression unless pleaded and proven as a distinct infringement of rights in the capacity of a member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99401</link>
      <description>Where validity of entries in the register of members is disputed, the preferred remedy is rectification and petitions under minority-protection provisions seeking relief dependent on membership alteration are not maintainable until rectification is determined; a change in management effected to protect or satisfy a creditor&#039;s interest falls within the creditor-exception and does not by itself constitute actionable conduct under minority-protection provisions; allegations of removal as director or general mismanagement do not constitute oppression unless pleaded and proven as a distinct infringement of rights in the capacity of a member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>