<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 672 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99390</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal of steel ingots through the assessee&#039;s own trucks was supported by seizure evidence, octroi entries and the absence of statutory records, justifying confiscation of the goods with redemption fine and sustaining the duty demand. The surrounding circumstances showed removal without payment of duty and the excess stock in the factory was not properly recorded. The personal penalty, however, was considered excessive on the facts and was reduced to Rs. 25,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 672 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99390</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal of steel ingots through the assessee&#039;s own trucks was supported by seizure evidence, octroi entries and the absence of statutory records, justifying confiscation of the goods with redemption fine and sustaining the duty demand. The surrounding circumstances showed removal without payment of duty and the excess stock in the factory was not properly recorded. The personal penalty, however, was considered excessive on the facts and was reduced to Rs. 25,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>