<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 671 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune on Computers and Components manufactured by the appellants. The goods did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 167/71 as they were not produced during research activities in a Scientific, Educational, or Research Institute. The extended period of limitation was invoked due to the appellants&#039; failure to comply with registration and licensing requirements, indicating an intention to evade payment. The assessable value for duty calculation was determined as the cum-duty price, and the penalty imposed was reduced to Rs. 25,000 considering the appellants&#039; status as a Government organization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 671 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune on Computers and Components manufactured by the appellants. The goods did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 167/71 as they were not produced during research activities in a Scientific, Educational, or Research Institute. The extended period of limitation was invoked due to the appellants&#039; failure to comply with registration and licensing requirements, indicating an intention to evade payment. The assessable value for duty calculation was determined as the cum-duty price, and the penalty imposed was reduced to Rs. 25,000 considering the appellants&#039; status as a Government organization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>