<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99380</link>
    <description>The court held that directors have statutory duties even after a winding-up order, including signing financial statements and providing explanations to auditors. Resignation does not absolve directors from explaining activities during their tenure. The court directed directors to appear before auditors to address queries and submit acceptance of stock inventory. Verification costs were to be borne by banks and the scheme sponsor. The court did not order costs for the summons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99380</link>
      <description>The court held that directors have statutory duties even after a winding-up order, including signing financial statements and providing explanations to auditors. Resignation does not absolve directors from explaining activities during their tenure. The court directed directors to appear before auditors to address queries and submit acceptance of stock inventory. Verification costs were to be borne by banks and the scheme sponsor. The court did not order costs for the summons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>