<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 652 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99368</link>
    <description>Provisional excise assessments and unsettled escalation bills did not justify personal penalty where duty on the escalated value had already been paid after the show cause notice. Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable to the period in dispute, and the penalty under that provision and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was set aside. The duty demand itself was sustained because the assessee did not dispute liability on the escalated value and had discharged that duty; only the penal consequences were removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 652 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99368</link>
      <description>Provisional excise assessments and unsettled escalation bills did not justify personal penalty where duty on the escalated value had already been paid after the show cause notice. Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable to the period in dispute, and the penalty under that provision and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was set aside. The duty demand itself was sustained because the assessee did not dispute liability on the escalated value and had discharged that duty; only the penal consequences were removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>