<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99338</link>
    <description>Section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 authorises a stay only of proceedings of a civil, pecuniary, or creditor-related character connected with a proposed compromise or arrangement. It does not extend to criminal prosecutions against the company or its officers, because criminal liability is independent of the compromise machinery and cannot be suspended merely by a pending scheme. Delay in seeking vacation of an ex parte stay order did not, on these facts, bar consideration of relief, as no fixed time limit controlled the application and the criminal proceedings were outside the scope of the stay. The compromise proceedings were allowed to continue subject to the modified terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99338</link>
      <description>Section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 authorises a stay only of proceedings of a civil, pecuniary, or creditor-related character connected with a proposed compromise or arrangement. It does not extend to criminal prosecutions against the company or its officers, because criminal liability is independent of the compromise machinery and cannot be suspended merely by a pending scheme. Delay in seeking vacation of an ex parte stay order did not, on these facts, bar consideration of relief, as no fixed time limit controlled the application and the criminal proceedings were outside the scope of the stay. The compromise proceedings were allowed to continue subject to the modified terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>