<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99334</link>
    <description>The court refused the company&#039;s application for adjournment due to prolonged delays in the proceedings. The winding-up petition was admitted, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution to avoid adverse consequences. The judgment stresses the need for diligence in cases involving significant financial liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99334</link>
      <description>The court refused the company&#039;s application for adjournment due to prolonged delays in the proceedings. The winding-up petition was admitted, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution to avoid adverse consequences. The judgment stresses the need for diligence in cases involving significant financial liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>