<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99332</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petition for winding up the company as it found the disputes raised by the company regarding the debt to be bona fide and substantial. The company was deemed commercially solvent with assets exceeding liabilities, ongoing business operations, and a net profit for the relevant period. The court emphasized that a winding-up petition is not a proper method to enforce a debt that is genuinely disputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99332</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petition for winding up the company as it found the disputes raised by the company regarding the debt to be bona fide and substantial. The company was deemed commercially solvent with assets exceeding liabilities, ongoing business operations, and a net profit for the relevant period. The court emphasized that a winding-up petition is not a proper method to enforce a debt that is genuinely disputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>