<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 894 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99326</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in appeals against penalty where the finding of knowledge of the smuggled nature of the goods was based only on presumption and assumption, without supporting evidence. The applicants&#039; plea of financial hardship was also taken into account. On that basis, the tribunal waived pre-deposit of the entire penalty amounts and stayed recovery of the penalties during pendency of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 894 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99326</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in appeals against penalty where the finding of knowledge of the smuggled nature of the goods was based only on presumption and assumption, without supporting evidence. The applicants&#039; plea of financial hardship was also taken into account. On that basis, the tribunal waived pre-deposit of the entire penalty amounts and stayed recovery of the penalties during pendency of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>