<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99319</link>
    <description>Allotment of unissued equity shares must comply with Article 23 of the articles of association by first offering shares to existing members in proportion to their holdings. A general notice that does not specify each member&#039;s entitlement does not meet that requirement. Rectification of the register under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 remains available where the issues can be determined summarily; affected allottees and the company are necessary parties, not every shareholder. The allotment process was also challenged for excluding a director from the board meetings approving and confirming the issue. The stated outcome was invalidation of the allotment, rectification of the share register, and reissue in accordance with Article 23.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99319</link>
      <description>Allotment of unissued equity shares must comply with Article 23 of the articles of association by first offering shares to existing members in proportion to their holdings. A general notice that does not specify each member&#039;s entitlement does not meet that requirement. Rectification of the register under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 remains available where the issues can be determined summarily; affected allottees and the company are necessary parties, not every shareholder. The allotment process was also challenged for excluding a director from the board meetings approving and confirming the issue. The stated outcome was invalidation of the allotment, rectification of the share register, and reissue in accordance with Article 23.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>