<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (5) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99312</link>
    <description>The court found that there was no valid application, allotment, or communication regarding the 50,000 shares in question. The petitioner was granted relief, and the register of members was ordered to be rectified to reflect that the petitioner was only allotted 500 shares, not 50,000. The court emphasized the importance of stricter provisions to avoid similar issues in future share allotments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (5) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99312</link>
      <description>The court found that there was no valid application, allotment, or communication regarding the 50,000 shares in question. The petitioner was granted relief, and the register of members was ordered to be rectified to reflect that the petitioner was only allotted 500 shares, not 50,000. The court emphasized the importance of stricter provisions to avoid similar issues in future share allotments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>