<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99293</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391, 392, 393, and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, approving the merger of a UK-incorporated company with an Indian company. The court ordered the dissolution of the UK company without winding up, citing the powers granted under section 394(1)(iv) for such actions. It clarified that the necessity of altering the memorandum of association for amalgamation was not required, as statutory provisions sufficed. The court emphasized that the report from the official liquidator was not mandatory for going concerns, aligning its decision with the statutory framework and dismissing objections from the Company Law Board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99293</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391, 392, 393, and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, approving the merger of a UK-incorporated company with an Indian company. The court ordered the dissolution of the UK company without winding up, citing the powers granted under section 394(1)(iv) for such actions. It clarified that the necessity of altering the memorandum of association for amalgamation was not required, as statutory provisions sufficed. The court emphasized that the report from the official liquidator was not mandatory for going concerns, aligning its decision with the statutory framework and dismissing objections from the Company Law Board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>