https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99284 The court dismissed the petition filed under section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956, challenging the election of directors due to irregularities in a meeting. The court held that the petition did not demonstrate impracticability in holding a meeting as required under section 186. The objections raised regarding the conduct of a specific meeting did not fall within the scope of section 186, which deals with situations where holding a meeting is impracticable. As a result, the court found the petition incompetent and dismissed it with costs. en-us Fri, 04 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99284 The court dismissed the petition filed under section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956, challenging the election of directors due to irregularities in a meeting. The court held that the petition did not demonstrate impracticability in holding a meeting as required under section 186. The objections raised regarding the conduct of a specific meeting did not fall within the scope of section 186, which deals with situations where holding a meeting is impracticable. As a result, the court found the petition incompetent and dismissed it with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99284