<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 830 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99254</link>
    <description>An adjudication order confirming a customs demand was set aside because no effective personal hearing was shown to have been fixed or granted, amounting to a serious breach of natural justice. The absence of rebuttal on this procedural defect reinforced the challenge. The merits of the demand were not examined, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with an effective opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:09:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 830 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99254</link>
      <description>An adjudication order confirming a customs demand was set aside because no effective personal hearing was shown to have been fixed or granted, amounting to a serious breach of natural justice. The absence of rebuttal on this procedural defect reinforced the challenge. The merits of the demand were not examined, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with an effective opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>