<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 707 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99240</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of steel seats for duty exemption. The Tribunal held that the steel seats were complete seats entitled to exemption notifications, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that upholstering was necessary for completeness. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the appellants&#039; belief in exemption due to the approval of classification lists by other manufacturers justified their non-compliance with excise formalities, leading to the allowance of the appeal on both merits and limitation, thereby setting aside the Order-in-Original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 707 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99240</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of steel seats for duty exemption. The Tribunal held that the steel seats were complete seats entitled to exemption notifications, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that upholstering was necessary for completeness. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the appellants&#039; belief in exemption due to the approval of classification lists by other manufacturers justified their non-compliance with excise formalities, leading to the allowance of the appeal on both merits and limitation, thereby setting aside the Order-in-Original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>