<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 703 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99237</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Elecon (Madras) Ltd. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was not applicable as the assessee had not suppressed any material facts. The accurate descriptions of goods provided by the assessee led to the entire demand of duty being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:40:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 703 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99237</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Elecon (Madras) Ltd. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was not applicable as the assessee had not suppressed any material facts. The accurate descriptions of goods provided by the assessee led to the entire demand of duty being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>