<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (4) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99230</link>
    <description>Money deducted from employees&#039; wages for remittance to a co-operative credit society, under the governing wage and co-operative arrangement, is held for a specific purpose and not as the company&#039;s beneficial property. Because the company had only a custodial role, with no debtor-creditor relationship, no interest element, and no indication that the society placed surplus funds with it, the deductions were impressed with a trust. In winding up, the liquidator could claim only property to which the company had legal and beneficial title. The deducted sums therefore did not form part of the assets available for general distribution and were recoverable by the society in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (4) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99230</link>
      <description>Money deducted from employees&#039; wages for remittance to a co-operative credit society, under the governing wage and co-operative arrangement, is held for a specific purpose and not as the company&#039;s beneficial property. Because the company had only a custodial role, with no debtor-creditor relationship, no interest element, and no indication that the society placed surplus funds with it, the deductions were impressed with a trust. In winding up, the liquidator could claim only property to which the company had legal and beneficial title. The deducted sums therefore did not form part of the assets available for general distribution and were recoverable by the society in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>