https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99213 The appeal was rejected by the Member (Judicial) as there was no short levy of customs duty, and discrepancies were attributed to administrative oversight. The Vice-President allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing that once a contract is registered under Project Imports, all items covered by the licence should be assessed under this scheme. The Third Member concurred with the Member (Judicial), rejecting the Revenue's appeal as the importer had indicated not to avail the project import facility for the items in question imported before registration. en-us Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:02:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99213 The appeal was rejected by the Member (Judicial) as there was no short levy of customs duty, and discrepancies were attributed to administrative oversight. The Vice-President allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing that once a contract is registered under Project Imports, all items covered by the licence should be assessed under this scheme. The Third Member concurred with the Member (Judicial), rejecting the Revenue's appeal as the importer had indicated not to avail the project import facility for the items in question imported before registration. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99213