<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 756 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99192</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57A was unavailable on dyed nylon crimped yarn purchased without payment of duty because Rule 57D(2) applies only where an intermediate product emerges in the assessee&#039;s own manufacturing process. The dyed nylon yarn had not come into existence as an intermediate product in the assessee&#039;s hands; it was acquired as such from outside. Authorities cited on different factual settings, including job-work situations, were distinguished. Any alleged procedural lapse under Rule 57F did not change the operative fact that the goods were purchased in exempt form, so the credit claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 756 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99192</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57A was unavailable on dyed nylon crimped yarn purchased without payment of duty because Rule 57D(2) applies only where an intermediate product emerges in the assessee&#039;s own manufacturing process. The dyed nylon yarn had not come into existence as an intermediate product in the assessee&#039;s hands; it was acquired as such from outside. Authorities cited on different factual settings, including job-work situations, were distinguished. Any alleged procedural lapse under Rule 57F did not change the operative fact that the goods were purchased in exempt form, so the credit claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>